Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Job vs volunteering

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete per WP:SNOW. Nick Dowling (talk) 09:09, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Job vs volunteering

Job vs volunteering (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

WP:OR essay. Hemlock Martinis (talk) 23:32, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. --Snigbrook ^(talk) 23:50, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, clearly an OR essay with no references. -- Mithent (talk) 23:57, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete not an encyclopedic article, or even title. Pros and cons of volunteering can be discussed at that article. Malc82 (talk) 00:08, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
• Strong Delete per WP:NOR, WP:NPOV, WP:V, and "[sources coming soon]." Mr Senseless (talk) 01:08, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
• Strong Delete per nom. – ukexpat (talk) 01:37, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
• Strong Delete Wikipedia is no place for personal essays Doc Strange^{Telepathic Messages}Strange Frequencies 02:39, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Per WP:NOT#PUBLISHER, and WP:NOR. An essay is not an encyclopedia article. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 02:58, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. This belongs on the op-ed page of a newspaper, not in an encyclopedia. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 03:27, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.