Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesús Gabaldón

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Regarding the presence in other wikis, WP:INN is relevant, and counts double for articles in other Wikipedias. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 11:13, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jesús Gabaldón

I can't see how this musician is notable. Unlike every notable bassist I can think of, he doesn't have an allmusic.com entry, nor does he seem to have a presence on the web other than on venues for self promotion (personal websites, youtube, etc.) He appears to be a legitimate working musician, but I fail to see how he merits an encyclopedia article. The Fat Man Who Never Came Back 14:35, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Anonymous user 81.202.127.177 seems to be attempting to make the argument that Gabldon is a prolific session musician in Spain [1]. If this is true, the article could be pefectly valid-- as long as we can verify whether some of the recordings the user lists are notable... in any case, this anon editor is now going around blanking all pages associated with the musician [2] [3] [4]. I find this behaviour inexplicable.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back 07:48, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Deathphoenix ʕ 03:49, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, article provides zero context or biographical data and a long list of red / non links. Spanish article has a bio but still a mass of redlinks. Deizio talk 09:58, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

• Wait. This subject appears to have an article in a number of other languages on Wikipedia. Can someone familiar with this genre of music, or who is fluent in Spanish please comment? RFerreira 00:48, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep per entry in multiple wikis. Extensive discography checks out. Catchpole 21:22, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per comments by Deiz. Additionally, unless someone can point me to a policy that states contrary I do not think being in articles other Wikis necessarily means it qualifies for THIS Wiki.--Tony 00:26, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - there are no reviews or other external citations that can be used to establish notability. The article is simply a long discography thet would be better placed on a website and there is no encyclopaedic content. Looks as though it may have been deleted in some other versions too. BlueValour 23:57, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.