Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Kicklighter

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. seresin ( ¡? ) 05:30, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] James Kicklighter

James Kicklighter (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Sources don't seem to show sufficient notability per WP:BIO NawlinWiki (talk) 16:18, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete, per nom. Nakon 16:24, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 16:44, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - plainly a talented and up and coming individual. However, he has yet to achieve anything notable and fails to meet WP:BIO. BlueValour (talk) 19:07, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep - Check the discussion, but per the rules as I interpret them, I should be allowed to be there. There is secondary sources, including news articles and press releases, blogs from independents, etc. The Dub Taylor project, specifically, is the first project to recognize the character actor and will be taken to film festivals early next year. In Georgia, I served on the first Student Advisory Council, which was groundbreaking because it was the first time students directly impacted Educational policy. I know I'm biased as to why it should stay, but there are no opinions in the article, it is strictly factual. Other people, such as Gabe Sachs, have edited their own Wikipedia entries as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by James Kicklighter (talk • contribs) 22:44, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:BIO and for obvious COI. Ford MF (talk) 23:12, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. Vanity article.--CyberGhostface (talk) 03:26, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete. Fails by WP:RS and WP:BIO and WP:AUTO and WP:COI and WP:Single-purpose account and WP:SPAM and probably a few other guidelines we could throw at him. Also, any admin reading this should immediately block him for inappropriate user name. Qworty (talk) 03:02, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Your own name isn't inappropriate, even if you are creating and editing an article about yourself that, yes, should be deleted per A7. Daniel Case (talk) 04:12, 27 April 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.