Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Pichhadze

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:47, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jacob Pichhadze

PROD removed by anon-IP; NN-artist, 572 google hits, no claim of notability delete DesertSky85451 02:59, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

• Strong delete: The behavior of 74.12.103.177 in removing the AfD notice from the page and blanking this page makes me take a shoot-on-sight stance without any further investigation into what looks like a COI entry. This sort of behavior cannot be tolerated. --Groggy Dice 16:14, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: could be enough G-hits on an artist, but in this case almost half appear to be listings of Yazi Gallery in Toronto, which mentions him among their roster of artists, and none appear to be reviews in even a local newspaper. Exactly one appears to be one of his students describing him as an "influence", but no indication that she is notable, either. - Jmabel | Talk 18:13, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
• Do not Touch. The article contains references to all the claims made in it. Moreover, the conduct of Due Diligence on a person via Google (though a great tool fot initial research) is insufficient in and by it self. And a blind reliance on such a tool is unacademic and is subject to error. I suggest that the kind learned reviewers listed above view the article again and review the articles sited (which are not available electronically incidentally). The reviewers should consider contacting the appropriate cited sources and ask or the microfilm and review the artiles. If such steps are not taken, and the suggestionn for deletion is based on the mere fact that the sources are only available in hardcopy, and Wikipedia.org removes the article based on those grounds, then Wikipedia.org falls short of its stated claims. Concerned Wikipidia reader. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.197.230.69 (talk • contribs)
  • Note: For bios the article needs to assert notability. It is not for Wikipedia to go out and source all information. That's what you do when you create and edit an article. Vegaswikian 18:59, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, google hits are meaningless...where is the real verifiable proof of notability? Green hornet 05:29, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.