Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Laity

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel Bryant 08:25, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jack_Laity

Jack_Laity (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No assertion of notability and Mr. Laity doesn't appear to be notable. Article was already prodded, creator removed tag. --Akhilleus (talk) 06:12, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete He appeared on a stamp, but the criteria for this seems to have been being just another Aussie. Along with the other 26 people in this stamp series, may be the only people pictured on postage stamps to not be notable enough for WP entries. I'm sure someone will start a list.--killing sparrows 12:27, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Create an article on "Face of Australia" stamp sheet in general, with a list of all those depicted, but probably no further information about any of them, if this article is not to be kept. --Daniel C. Boyer 19:03, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment, That's actually a pretty good idea, I may even do it myself. --killing sparrows 01:03, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge → Australia Post Stamps and Products, which would require extending the listing back to 2000 and treating the Laity stamp as part of the Face of Australia issue. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:48, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 16:32, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment. If the Face of Australia stamp sheet article is created, then this should redirect to that article. Otherwise, it should be deleted as there is no evidence that he is notable enough to warrant an article. Capitalistroadster 03:31, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 03:31, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as not notable. Sarah 07:30, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, the whole point of these stamps was that the people depicted were not notable. Lankiveil 12:12, 12 April 2007 (UTC).
  • Delete non-notable and no independent sources (the Australia Post website is something of a self-reference). Orderinchaos 15:08, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per comment above by Capitalistroadster. Euryalus 09:23, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.