Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute of bio-it

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 01:12, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Institute of bio-it

Institute of bio-it (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

non notable organization, the article was tagged for speedy deletion for copyvio , then proposed for deletion, the author has removed the tag. There is a conflict of interest too. Cenarium (talk) 16:23, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete Not notable organization. It appears to be a start-up as the main website (which seems to be the only source) is not filled. It has a surface but no content.--Pmedema (talk) 16:51, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - the fact that the author has repeatedly removed the PRODs without any comment on either the discussion page or edit summary caused alarm bells for me! The article makes no claim of notability, and googling the exact phrase returns just under 600 hits, one of which is this link which I think is a page about the author of the article, and which leads me to agree with Cenarium's view that there is indeed a conflict of interest. -- JediLofty ^{User ¦ Talk} 16:56, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete but dont judge by removing repeated prods--the second prod is my fault--I should not have placed it, but sent it here directly. If one prod is removed, there's no point in another. But this srtuck me as typical attempt at publicity for a new organisation. DGG (talk) 23:00, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Comment - it wasn't the repeated PROD removal I was judging; it was the repeated PROD removal with no comment on the discussion page or edit summary.-- JediLofty ^{User ¦ Talk} 09:41, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.