Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Idan Mintz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Addhoc (talk) 17:38, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Idan Mintz

Idan Mintz (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Has this up as a CSD under A7, was removed (I think accidentally, per page history) by another user, so I figured I'd take it here. Subject isn't remotely notable; Google search for his name reveals only one result from www.teacherweb.com. Gromlakh (talk) 02:15, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete NN person (possibly self-created or created by an overzealous family member). Article isn't linked to anything. I can verify the fact that only one site brings up anything about the person this article is about. Doc Strange (talk) 03:21, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy delete Unreferenced, too short, and doesn't meet notability. ― LADY GALAXY 04:49, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy delete, notability not asserted, no context. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 06:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
• Speedily delete. Apparently a brilliant kid, but no evidence of notability, and not even reliable sources on apparent brilliance. —SlamDiego_←T 13:39, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
• Comment: I noticed that the article's creator, Eggbertman, removed the AfD notice. I have restored it, but someone will probably need to keep an eye on it. —SlamDiego_←T 13:44, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per WP:BIO. Restored speedy delete tag that was removed by article's creator. Mh29255 (talk) 14:22, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

• Comment: FWIW, it was not the page creator who removed the speedy tag. He did later remove the AfD notice, but he didn't pull my speedy tag. That was done by Lbr123, and I'm pretty sure it was an accident. His edit summary said he was correcting a misspelling, but he actually blanked the page. The next edit was the author putting back his original text. I have a feeling the speedy template removal was just an accident. Gromlakh (talk) 17:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification. Mh29255 (talk) 17:06, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.