Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ice age 3

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy Redirect/Withdrawl --lightdarkness ^(talk) 02:09, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ice age 3

Crystalballism, per WP:NOT. I added a PROD tag, but creator then placed {{vfd}} on the page. I've fixed the tag, and brought it here. lightdarkness ^(talk) 21:18, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - As Nominator. --lightdarkness ^(talk) 21:18, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete/Speedy not a crystal ball. -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 21:34, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• ha i want in -—This unsigned comment was added by Crowny1111 (talk • contribs) 21:37, 3 April 2006.
• Delete -- Curps 21:55, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Crystal ball.--Alabamaboy 21:58, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete Your aura is pulsing my dear… which is odd since there ain't no crystal ball here. --Fbv65edel ^{(discuss | contribs)} 22:00, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep: I remember reading about the movie Resident Evil or Resident Evil 4 (film) a soon to be made movie. [1]. Unlike Ice age 3 the resident evil movie was properly sourced and made it through the afd. So the issue here is not on Cristaballism it is more on reliable sources. As is, the Ice age 3 article does not have enough substance (verifiable information). So as per the nomination of cristallism I shun the idea and even suggest it be renominated for deletion for lack of WP:V. (lack of verifiable information.) You might be wondering why I did not vote delete. That is because I highly frown upon bad deletion nomination and I believe the process should be restarted --CyclePat 23:42, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Redirect to already existing article Ice Age: The Meltdown. I've already done the redirect.--Isotope23 02:02, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.