Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IGene

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete.  (aeropagitica)  20:11, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] IGene

Delete: Never used for any sensible content James 22:14, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. I've reverted the page to it's pre-vandilised form, so that it does contain "sensible" content. The article is about a book by entertainment columnist Gene Geter (the article on whom was deleted in December, tagged {{cleanup-importance}} although no reason for deletion was given). Anyhow, the book doesn't seem sufficiently notable to gain an article, particularly given it's author doesn't even have a page. _└ ^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 22:29, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. iGene is not notable. The author, Gene Geter seems notable though. --Ezeu 02:40, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable. tv316 17:33, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.