Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holidaylettings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 23:20, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Holidaylettings

Holidaylettings (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

The deletion of MyHoliday.com led me to this article. It barely asserts notability, and it does not cite any references other than its own website. It has existed for several months -- enough time for references to be added, none have been. ukexpat (talk) 19:51, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete: Fails WP:RS and WP:N. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 19:51, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Blimey, that was quick! – ukexpat (talk) 19:52, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - No reliable sources —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.210.172 (talk)
• Delete as per above. --Kristjan Wager (talk) 20:18, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Doing a quick google news search, (as well as a general google search), everything is either a press release, homepage/mirror, or in the case of the news search, an article "brought to you by Holidaylettings" and not actually about "Holidaylettings.". In other words, no reliable, independent sources that assert the notability of this company. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 20:23, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Reads like an ads. Chris! _ct 03:26, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete As per nom.Paste (talk) 20:36, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom --Enric Naval (talk) 17:53, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.