Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Grow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep and tag for references. Snowball. Non admin closure. Giggy ^{Talk | Review} 05:13, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Henry Grow

Henry_Grow (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Totally unsourced. Possible original research or plagiarism. A Google search turns up that this guy lived and died on the stated dates, and that he helped build the building it says he built, but that's about all I can find. Only 90 hits on "Henry Grow" 1891, most of which are Wikipedia mirrors. Reswobslc 04:40, 3 August 2007 (UTC) I withdraw the nomination because I found the sources myself (with the help of the Google book link). The text appears to be adapted from the source I added - with it being dated 1886, the possibility of plagiarism is moot. Reswobslc 05:12, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep unless proven plagiarism and flag for references. Google books gives the following: [1]. A name and death date is not a good search. I used his name and "Mormon". --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 04:48, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep and tag with reference notices : Tag and give the author(s) a chance to provide references. It's possible the editor just forgot to add references after writing the text. The original author of the article, who wrote the bulk of it, was not even notified of this nomination until I did so. Subject is clearly notable and is referred to in a number of books from google books. –SESmith 04:56, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, needs references but not deletion. Subject is clearly notable. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 04:59, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.