Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heidi Thomas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 17:40, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Heidi Thomas

Heidi Thomas (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Little assertion of notability, no references or external links. Retiono Virginian 12:54, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep: seems to be a notable screenwriter and playwright. She's no Alan Bleasdale, but there's plenty of stuff out there (IMDb page, BBC Q&A). Poor referencing is a reason for improvement, not a reason for deletion. — mholland (talk) 13:33, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment- Oh. Can you add these references to the article and it might help you win your dicussion, thanks. Retiono Virginian 13:41, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep: if the references are added. But need more secondary sources to assert notbility. --soum (0_o) 13:52, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - I'm sure sources could be found and the article improved. User:Veesicle 19:32, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, source and expand; the reliable sources mholland found do seem to confirm her notability. Krimpet (talk/review) 03:13, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, sources and BBC coverage above should be included in the article. --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 11:49, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, but definetely source and expand. Had this article had no real notability, I don't doubt that it would have been deleted, but a Google search brought up 2 Million + articles, and judging from the number possibly pertaining to this person on the 1st page, perhaps 10-12% could be pertaining to her in total. Mastrchf91 02:01, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep but plenty of fleshing out available here for those interested.--VS talk 07:17, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.