The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 10:56, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Non-notable, and a protologism. Fails WP:NEO. Asenine 07:44, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete as soon as practicable. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 07:46, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete or speedy as nonsense or hoax. Beach drifter (talk) 07:48, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete (ec) Fails WP:N and violates WP:NEO. It is possibly a WP:HOAX. It is a poorly written article with no reliable sources.--RyRy5 (talk) 07:49, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.