Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Granada Undivided High School

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 07:24, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Granada Undivided High School

Granada Undivided High School (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

I don't think this article should be deleted, but am going through proper procedures as other editors don't want to do it properly. This article has been speedy-tagged and redirected each in the hour since its creation. Chris 00:14, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Comment In what way is it undivided and how is it any less so than another school? ~ Infrangible 00:56, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • I was curious about that myself-what they mean is what in other Colorado schools are called "Junior/Senior High School". They run six grades, 7-12 instead of the usual 3 or 4. It's just the way they decided the name the thing, to show that it also is Infrangible. ;) Chris 01:00, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • delete, unless their museum is notable.DGG (talk) 01:05, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep The school is remarkably small (about 120 students in grades 7-12) and has been remarkably successful in statewide athletics over the past decade. The school has established a museum for a WWII-era Japanese Internment camp. The schools sports teams competed with teams from the internment camp, all of which has reliable documentation available. More details are forthcoming regarding the museum and interaction with the camp's residents, but there is enough material to establish notability using reliable and verifiable sources. Alansohn 03:02, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, article demonstrates the infrangibility of its topic. Kappa 04:18, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep — Satusfactory. — RJH (talk) 17:29, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Good article on an essential topic. Golfcam 17:33, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep per above. I fixed one grammatical mistake. Bearian 20:20, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep Since when is it proper procedure to AfD an article within an hour of it's creation? Dhaluza 00:19, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • reply it was either force it here for the good folks to vote on or see it speedy-deleted unseen. I chose this way. Chris 05:23, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.