Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glulam Beam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge into Glued laminated timber. Jreferee T/C 17:50, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Glulam Beam

Glulam Beam (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Advertisement Waikikibeach 17:29, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:02, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

• Merge and redirect to Glued laminated timber. Notable material, but I don't see it needing two seperate articles. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:58, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete as WP:SPAM per CSD 11. --Gavin Collins 13:22, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete, blatant advertising. _{Hydrogen Iodide (HI!)} 16:36, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletions. -- Gavin Collins 13:22, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Delete. Advertising. Keb25 13:34, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete then redirect to Glued laminated timber which says the same thing without the spam. Acroterion _(talk) 18:43, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
• Merge into Glued laminated timber. There's not enough here to understand why a second article or even a fork would be needed. --BlindEagle^{talk~contribs} 20:11, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.