Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glenn Everett Morrison

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:56, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Glenn Everett Morrison

Glenn Everett Morrison (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Non-notable person --Infrangible 02:34, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - no assertation of notability. -- MarcoTolo 02:56, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Google scholar at http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=GE+Morrison+Kooy lists a number of papers by GE Morrison which have been cited by others. This suggests some notability. --Eastmain 03:17, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

  Hard to tell which papers are his on ISI, but he seems to have an h-index of about 4 or 5 at the very most, not enough to pass WP:PROF via the impact of his published work at this stage, IMHO. Pete.Hurd 19:16, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete He's not there yet. GS is tricky to interpret, some are acknowledgments in a paper & some are just citing the papers. Since this is biomedicine, I use PubMed: there are only 3 real articles, the other 11 listed with his name are other people. all three of them he were with his professor. the most recent was in 2001. There is no indication of any scientific work since then. I am very ready to accept any claim of notability for a researcher, but 3 pubs while a grad student and none since is below the average. Didn't even go for a post-doc, which is sort of the minimum qualification for a bio researcher. DGG 04:17, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I agree with User:DGG, he only got his PhD in 2000, I'd expect it to take longer for him to establish notability in academia.-- danntm ^T _C 17:18, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per DGG and danntm. --Dhartung | Talk 18:21, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as per DGG. Seems like he could become notable in the future. J Milburn 18:53, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per DGG. Pete.Hurd 19:18, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- Pete.Hurd 02:19, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. NN. It was contributed from a WP:SPA (Special:Contributions/Hnicgm), which always makes me worry that notability is a big problem, and the arguments above definitely make this a quick decision to delete for me. John Vandenberg 08:09, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.