Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flaw

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep - passes WP:MUSIC. Kilo-Lima|^(talk) 14:36, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Flaw

Delete. Decent article on describing the band but the band seems to have contributed little to nothing major to music or its genre. The band is not notable and the article actually tells why the band is not notable. Many bands try to make it get to a very low level of prominance then fail miserably. This one is not special. Strothra 22:11, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete non-notable band #3,893,321,620 listed in Wikipedia. Aplomado - UTC 22:45, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, defunct minor band. Stifle (talk) 00:07, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unknown Blink484 22:09, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep It was not totally unknown, was played on mainstream radio, and at least the first of its albums was quite popular. In an interview with Chris, he notes, "Almost every show has sold out and were getting a chance to play a lot of cities that we haven't been to yet." Indeed, the band was up there touring with the big names and even used the same producer as Tool. I know it's not the most successful band in history, but I would think this is enough influence to be worth a Wikipedia article. Wild Bill (talk) 14:53, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, two albums on a major label passes WP:MUSIC. Kappa 09:51, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.