User talk:Wild Bill
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome to Wikipedia! - MattTM 05:03, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] parrot
Sorry, deletion of Hawk-headed Parrot was unintentional, but it is on the list under its other name of Red-fan Parrot. If an article gets written, one of these will need to redirect to the other. jimfbleak 05:24, 31 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- The other thing I should have said is that lists for animals and plants are usually based on relationships, rather than alphabetically, which is why I initially deleted the alphabetical list and restored the taxonomic list. However, I realised that for a few very large groups, such as parrots, hummingbirds and doves, it actually makes life easier to have access to the alternative listing, so I restored it as a linked page (not on the main article to avoid another deletion of the taxolist). jimfbleak 05:43, 31 Jul 2004 (UTC)
[edit] moved image
hey. I know this is really late, but I saw your message on Merovingian's talk page regarding [1], and I noticed it was never moved. I've done it for you. In the future, you can just re-upload the file under a different name and tag the old one as a speedy deletion candidate. See ya around! -Frazzydee|✍ 22:04, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
[edit] IMGrammarBot
FYI, an article about your bot is up for deletion. Thought you might be interested in the discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IMGrammarBot. Regards, howcheng {chat} 18:49, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] MTNBox template
Thanks for sorting out the template, I don't deal with template editing a great deal so I was having a little difficulty tracking down the template and by the time I'd got there you'd already sorted it.--Sully 18:22, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Submersed Band.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Submersed Band.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add
{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Leon Sword 02:00, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Flaw Endangered Species.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Flaw Endangered Species.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:46, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lo-Pro - Lo-Pro (album).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lo-Pro - Lo-Pro (album).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 00:52, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

