Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatih Çokoy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete with some salt.--JForget 23:59, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fatih Çokoy

Fatih Çokoy (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable artist repeatedly being created by the article's subject. Invariably it has no content and merely refers to being an artist and then a link to the subject's own website. It's already been speedied 7 previous times so it's about time for AFD now I feel. Reason for nomination: WP:N, WP:SPAM, WP:COI -- WebHamster 21:54, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete and salt per nom. NASCAR Fan24^{(radio me!)} 21:56, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete and salt per nom (as one of the previous CSD deleters). Number 57 22:00, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete and salt I was just doing NP patrol and was going to tag it for speedy delete for no assertion of notability, but wanted to give it time. But, seeing the above comments, no need.--Sethacus 22:17, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete and Salt: Nominator. The sooner the better before the article's creator falls foul of the 3RR rule by continually deleting the AfD notice. ---- WebHamster 22:51, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

• Comment: Just out of interest I went to the weblink given in the article. The art being pushed is a selection of sketches of Disney characters. So it's looking like there's a contravention of WP:EL too. ---- WebHamster 00:01, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, salt, and be done with it. The poster can't even stop him/her/itself from removing delete notices and has, despite numerous opportunities, refused to make a case for keeping it, instead claiming that some backroom "arrangement" is being made. Yeah right. Plus all of the grounds enunciated by nom. -- Dethme0w 22:53, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete and salt. The original version of this article was an autobiography; writing style leads me to believe that every user that has since created this page has been a sockpuppet. The artist's English is not very fluent, and he doesn't appear to understand the notability criteria, so salting will be the only way to avoid recreation. -FisherQueen (Talk) 23:05, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete with salt, per nominator. /Blaxthos 23:18, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete and salt per WP:N and WP:BIO. STORMTRACKER 94 Stormtracker94 23:18, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.