Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exemption (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:59, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Exemption (band)

Exemption (band) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Rather than A7 this a 2nd time I'm running it through here to see what other editors think: Fails WP:Notability (bands) Gwen Gale (talk) 02:53, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

• CommentGuess what you forgot to do in this AfD? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 02:46, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Ta! Gwen Gale (talk) 02:53, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

• Delete WP:MUSIC. Has someone emailed Nick Lee at the address supplied in the article to tell him it's about to be deleted????  Esradekan Gibb  ^"Talk" 03:06, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - Small time. Unsigned. Utter bandspam. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:11, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
• Delete No assertation of notability per WP:MUSIC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 15:42, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy delete An article on a 2001 music band with no clear assertion of notability after 7 years. Artene50 (talk) 02:43, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.