Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evacipate

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD✉ 00:36, 1 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Evacipate

A neologism from a movie that has no definition other than those "proposed" by the movie's fans. Joyous (talk) 00:03, July 18, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete nn neologism/dictdef. Ken 00:08, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable neologism. Gwk 00:09, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete or if verifiable merge with Primer (movie) Flowerparty 00:14, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
• Move to Wiktionary and delete. — Stevey7788 (talk) 01:01, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. "The word was not defined in the movie... Here are some definitions proposed by various fans." Oy. Dcarrano 04:18, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable. Cnwb 07:17, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete neologism. JamesBurns 09:51, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
• I want to disrupt Wikipedia to prove a point, so I'm going to vote keep. Wait a second, no I don't! Delete this, delete it most smitingly, with no moves, merges, redirects, transwikings, or anything else that would preserve in any way any of this content. It doesn't even qualify as a neologism or, I would think, even as Primercruft: it's a (non-notable?) fictional character's attempt to cheat at Scrabble. No encyclopedic value whatsoever. Send it to the dumpster of history and be done with it. The Literate Engineer 15:23, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Neologism. Jayjg ^(talk) 23:32, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete or redirect to Primer. Binadot 02:36, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.