Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eta Omega Tau

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:31, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Eta Omega Tau

Non-notable sorority. Unless we want to accept articles on every fraternity and sorority (and dmoz lists 7082 of them), I can't see why small sororities like this with no reliable sources on them should warrant a wikipedia article. According to their website, they have 82 members, almost all clearly having graduated by now. Xyzzyplugh 00:09, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, nn. KillerChihuahua^?!? 00:17, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Royboycrashfan 00:19, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Bucketsofg 01:02, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete The fact that it has chapters in four universities does indicate that it's crossed one important notability threshold. But the membership numbers just seem too low - if I read the website right, they average two new members a year. --Hyperbole 01:08, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable sorority --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 02:33, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as a fraternity or sorority. JIP | Talk 07:45, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn. --Terence Ong 13:25, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 09:03, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 17:38, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, as above. ProhibitOnions 00:18, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn -M^ask 00:50, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Arbusto 06:44, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.