Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edd Billig

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 15:05, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edd Billig

Tagged as db-bio but notability is asserted, but not particularly convincingly. Maybe he is the next Su Doku world champion - or maybe not. Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] 20:01, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete - Google only turns up a handful of results, some on the Ed Edd n Eddy TV show. There is an article regarding his quest for grand mastership or whatever, but it doesn't really assert notability. Perhaps if he does become the grand master, and there is significant media coverage it'll stay, but delete for now. --lightdarkness (talk) 20:55, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. After conducting a Google search I found out that Edd was one of thousands attemting to be a Sudoku grandmaster. Not notable enough - yet. No Guru 23:35, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per No Guru --Ruby 01:42, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, (and move to Edward Billig if kept). http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/4693381.stm says he's not just one of thousands attempting to be a grandmaster, but actually won the thing. - Bobet 13:21, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. Looks like he won a newspaper competiton. Not sure that sways me towards thinking he is notable enought to warrant an article, however. No Guru 02:41, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete – The Independent will crown another champ next year, but we may never hear from this player again. If that one contest was a really big deal, someone can add it — and this guy's name — to Su Doku. ×Meegs 00:08, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.