Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EBabe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 19:50, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] EBabe

EBabe (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Subject not important - author already incorporated the gist of this article in eBay. Any further description of eBay policy on this practice unnecessary and not important as Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Also, contains original research & neologism without any references. Peasantwarrior (talk) 07:14, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete No sources, already mentioned in the eBay article (although maybe that should be removed from the article). There is no source for the term "eBabe" either. TJ Spyke 07:18, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination, no need for this neologism. Cat-five - talk 07:18, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - I thought this looked familiar. I just checked the logs and I was the one who patrolled it at new pages. It had a speedy on it at the time so marking it patrolled stopped other people wasting their time looking at it. Anyhow, my reason for deletion nn as per above. Also fails WP:NOR issues. Sting_au Talk 07:51, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
• Keep so that we can get more great photos. No, wait, I mean Delete as per nom. My id seized the keyboard for a sec. Ψν^Psi_nu 13:51, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as unsourced original research. Gwernol 14:09, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as WP:NEO. JJL (talk) 15:17, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. No cites (I don't consider the links to further images as cites, more a sad excuse). I can't find any clear and obvious use of the term, so is a neologism. The content is also blatant original research. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 16:27, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Note though that the content that was inserted into eBay has been removed as OR. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 18:31, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
• Snowball delete. I can't think of any speedy criteria that apply but this article sure as hell is crap.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 13:26, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Fully agree with above. OR. Think outside the box 17:51, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Completely useless article, belongs over at UrbanDictionary Alloranleon (talk) 09:22, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
• Keep as I did a Dogpile search and the word does seem to come up frequently. Happy New Year! --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 18:43, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Did you read those results? None of them are for the term "eBabe" as used in this article, except of course the search result for the Wikipedia article... Gwernol 18:50, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.