Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E. B. Green

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 06:30, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] E. B. Green

E. B. Green (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

I've searched high and low to verify this product and these claims. I can't find a thing. It is either a hoax, extremely obscure or miswritten. Kingturtle (talk) 16:33, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete. An article about stolen duct tape? Seriously? I have absconded with some unbelievably superior office pens; let me get that article started... - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 16:35, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - It's not a hoax per :[1], however, I don't think it's particularly notable. Wisdom89 (T / C) 16:37, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Not A7 eligible, may or may not be a hoax, and not nonsense. Only barely makes past getting speedied. That's not enough to keep this. DarkAudit (talk) 16:38, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment - maybe it should just be renamed "EB Green Tape". That actually gets 50+ google hits. Kingturtle (talk) 16:46, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - I don't think that it's that notable enough. So sorry to the user that created this but DELETEMarkreidyhp 17:05, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - Following up on Wisdom89's google link it is evident it may not be a hoax, but I must also agree there does not seem to be enough notability to warrant an article. Shallon Michaels (talk) 17:23, 26 March 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.