Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E-Sangha

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 06:37, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] E-Sangha

E-Sangha (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Does not appear to meet WP:WEB according to the sources I see. Prod removed by creator after adding sources which, in my opinion, do not satisfactorily demonstrate notability. FisherQueen (Talk) 16:06, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

My apologies for removing the template, but I am not aware of an objective standard for making such a proof. In my mind, the sources were more than enough proof. What is the standard of proof? You say "in my opinion" but by what measure is your opinion authoritative in the matter? Please present a standard for proving notability that I can fulfill for the article. (A certain number of sources, perhaps?) Calaf 18:55, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

  • See Wikipedia:Notability (web) for the standards we hold in regards to notability of websites. You haven't shown how this forum meet them. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 19:59, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per failing WP:WEB and WP:N - Lack of sources with coverage Corpx 20:29, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Sources may not be particularly great, but there also seem to be other sources out there that could be used on the page, and together they do seem adequate to establish this site as a leading example of its kind. JulesH 20:31, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Er, I don't mean to be unhelpful, but that link is to a google search of the term. Which specific links did you use to establish notability? -FisherQueen (Talk) 20:36, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment All things are impermanent. Attachment leads to suffering. ~ Infrangible 13:38, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 15:44, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Agreed with Infrangible. Needs fixing. Bearian 00:00, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per failing WP:WEB and WP:N - Lack of sources with coverage Jikaku 19:39, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • At the moment E-Sangha members are discussing how to make the article legitimate. Expect further renovations within the next few days. Calaf 05:30, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.