Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DisplayConfigX

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Punkmorten 21:29, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] DisplayConfigX

Ad for software, no independent verification of widespread use/notability provided.--Peta 02:35, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete this reads like an advertisement. Stubbleboy 16:54, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 14:28, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

• Comment I created this article as a place for information I collected on the web on using LCD televisions as computer displays. I also added material to Extended display identification data and Native resolution and created the redirect Pixel perfect. A could have created an article named Display tweaking software (or something similar) and redirected DisplayConfigX and PowerStrip there. However I did not have information on PowerStrip and was not sure what to call this more general article.
  DisplayConfigX is notable, it was mentioned (though not redlinked) in the article Extended display identification data before my edits. Google gives 20,400 hits for DisplayConfigX. Most of these are forum posts where desperate users are searching for vital information they could not find in Wikipedia. (Some of these are even posting their newby questions on Wikipedia talk pages. [1])
  PowerStrip gets 1,360,000 Google hits, but this is Windows software. -- Petri Krohn 04:08, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Deathphoenix ʕ 21:18, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment: Relisting one more time. I think if there are no more !votes, this AfD should default to no consensus. --Deathphoenix ʕ 21:18, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete No indication of how this software meets the notability requirements in WP:SOFTWARE. Petri, forum posts are not considered reliable sources. NeoChaosX [talk | contribs] 21:37, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per above. ♠PMC♠ 22:50, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete zero results for news [2] and for review searches [3] at CNET; nothing at Slashdot [4]. Such results are unlikely for a notable piece of software.--Fuhghettaboutit 23:09, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. — Arbusto 05:34, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.