Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Device 2.0

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 00:20, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Device 2.0

Device 2.0 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Another "neologism 2.0" Artw 00:47, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete 2.0 as either a neologism or something made up in school one day. In either case it isn't notable enough to have an article. Koweja 00:58, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete non-notable. --Duke of Duchess Street 01:50, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete 2.0 BETA! - nn neologism. MER-C 01:51, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete neologism. --Sopoforic 02:55, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete 2.0 - just because someone puts 2.0 at the end of a word doesn't make it encyclopaedic. Orderinchaos78 03:51, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as a non-notable neologism. JIP | Talk 07:08, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, due to technical reasons: any device that speaks to anything that is so-called "enabled" for the so-called "Web 2.0 thing is way, WAY past its own version 2.0. Calling WP:NEO and the fact that I'm deathly allergic to marketing buzzwords. =^_^= --Dennisthe2 07:32, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete yet again, same as previous, non-notable AfD. Alex43223 Talk | Contribs | E-mail 07:47, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as with Telecom 2.0. Just a neologism unlikely to catch on. --MatthewUND(talk) 09:33, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete NN Neologism and Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Bastun 14:21, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom: non-notable. Bigtop 16:29, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Non-notable neologism.--Anthony.bradbury 16:32, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as unsourced neologism 2.0.19:43, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete this is a poorly sourced article about a rarely used neologism. TSO1D 04:10, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete non-notable, poorly sourced WP:NEO. Davidpdx 10:42, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as an unnecessary linguistic abomination. Metamagician3000 13:47, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Welcome back when iPod TagCloud (with integrated last.fm support), Nokia PastelShade (you can specify that all of your phone calls will be released under Creative Commons licence) and Sony Goomapper (the hypothetical Web 2.0 product that actually makes profit, because hey, it's a Sony product) are released and someone actually uses this term. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 14:02, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.