Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Della woods racing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Keilana(recall) 05:07, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Della woods racing

Della woods racing (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Completion of an incomplete nomination procedure. Blanchardb-MeMyEarsMyMouth-timed 09:05, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Delete Non-encyclopedic. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 09:02, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Delete If an article needs to be made on her, it should be at Della Woods. Xiong Chiamiov ::contact:: help! 09:26, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Strong delete Non notable driver, no sources, non-encyclopedic. STORMTRACKER 94 12:28, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete for lack of notability, sources. No prejudice against recreation if the subject's career takes off. ZZ Claims ~ Evidence 13:45, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - The woman held a record in drag racing (a male dominated sport) for 22 years, your suggesting that is not notable? user:John Reaves thinks it is as he removed the original {{db-nonsense}} template . I will always contend that we should Assume Good Faith, in that, articles will get Sources if they are not AfD'd within 1hour and 14 minutes of creation. Looking at User talk:Denichols shows no Welcome was ever issued to this new (now possibly lost) Editor, Instead after making their first edit to WP the article was taged for Speedy 4 minutes after creation. Is this how we welcome new users ? Exit2DOS2000•T•C• 01:00, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep as notable, but needs sourcing. Can be verified easily. I moved it to Della Woods. I have welcomed the newbie. Bearian (talk) 19:03, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - needs improvement, but notable. --Evb-wiki (talk) 22:55, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep as redirect done above; sources might be a little hard to harvest but not impossible and wikifying's not a chore. DukeEGR93 02:27, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete because it is non-encyclopedic. Tavix (talk) 05:05, 29 December 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.