Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DeChiangcization

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:53, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] DeChiangcization

DeChiangcization (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete - This is not a word in the English language (Google hits=0) and we should not create new words in Wikipedia. Furthermore, the article quotes no sources. The Chinese word can be moved to Wikitionary, while the substantive contents of this article can be moved to Chiang_Kai-shek#Death_and_legacy. Niohe 01:05, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Neologism. --Ideogram 01:15, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Neologism, and even disregarding that concern, there's no justification for it having its own article. --Nlu (talk) 08:23, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:NEO. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 08:54, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 10:30, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - no sources cited, and POV. --ImpartialCelt 16:53, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - no sources cited. --DorisH 18:03, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Neologism, POV.--Jerrypp772000 23:26, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. No sources cited, no way to tell if this is just make up or not. Burntsauce 23:31, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.