Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Utterback
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — TKD::Talk 13:50, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] David Utterback
Procedural nomination: was tagged for speedy deletion (A7) as not asserting notability. I take no position on the nomination at this time. David Eppstein 07:17, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. —David Eppstein 07:20, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete This was never a speedy due to the assertations made in the text. However, not counting the Original Research and biased point of view, (e.g. "is loved", "david on his work" etc.) I struggle to see how the grand claims in the lead match up to any Reliable Sources. Amazon have no works listed that I can see and Google seems slim - I can't be certain the e-bay refs are even him. Unless some verifiable information can be found then this looks un-promising. Pedro | Chat 09:06, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete is the only option here as the article fails WP:BIO and WP:V.-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 09:07, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I can't find anything remotely like a reliable source for any of the claims, and I agree, it fails WP:BIO and WP:V. Accounting4Taste 21:16, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 16:01, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete major WP:MEMORIAL. --Yeshivish 03:28, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Unfortunately, per notability requirements. • Lawrence Cohen 19:38, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
