Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David M. Thompson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.--Kubigula (talk) 19:10, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] David M. Thompson
notability, possible vanity page, probable violation of WP:COI Chris 03:22, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 03:57, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete unless notability for him/his works are established Corpx 04:11, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. —David Eppstein 05:50, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep. I added citations to three separate academically-published reviews of his book. That is enough to show some notability for his works, I think. —David Eppstein 06:06, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Wknight94 (talk) 10:24, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - His corpus of work is a specialist book and a few articles. SolidPlaid 01:14, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
- Weak delete Specialist books are what academics write--that's not a negative comment. But in general I do not think one book is enough to show notability for someone in the humanities. His composition would add to it, but whether his compositions are notable would depend upon whether they have been reviewed or performed. We need specialist help in this, and it has not been forthcoming. DGG (talk) 03:17, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
