Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark Alex 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. per WP:SNOW (non-admin) - Milk's Favorite Cookie 23:33, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Dark Alex

Dark Alex (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Not notable outside of the PSP universe.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Nakon (talk • contribs) 02:25, March 24, 2008

• Speedy keep, this article was unanimously kept less than 2 months ago and I don't see what has changed since then. This individual has been covered by BBC News. --Pixelface (talk) 02:33, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy keep on the grounds that this survived an AFD challenge less than 2 months ago. Articles must not be renominated repeatedly in such a short period of time. 23skidoo (talk) 02:46, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep This person is a notable programmer. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 02:48, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
• Comment: The nominator uses the phrase "PSP universe" as if he or she thinks this is a fictional person. —Quasirandom (talk) 03:03, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

  That is entirely untrue. Nakon 03:07, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

• Speedy keep per news coverage and WP:KEEPLISTINGTILITGETSDELETED. 'The PSP universe' does make it sound like you're talking about a fictional place, and that could be dangerous for non-technical editors who look at this and don't realize that the person really exists. Also, that's a bad argument to make, as John Dee is probably not notable outside the 'cabalistic universe', and Sally Kern is not notable outside of the 'American universe'. Aside from all this, for his notability, he has received BBC coverage, which has also been posted, and this is essentially a repeat of the previous nomination. Celarnor ^{Talk to me} 07:39, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

• Weak Keep This article doesn't seem notable, but due to the issues brought up above, I'd have to go with weak keep. Thedjatclubrock :-) ^(T/C)
• Keep - seems notable enough, and previously had a failed AfD, so it deserves to be on wikipedia..--Cometstyles 10:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep - per above comments. iMatthew 2008 11:45, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep - as per comments in the previous deletion discussion. Why anyone would suggest deletion of an article so soon after it has survived an AFD discussion is beyond me. Are there no wiki policies to prevent us having to defend and re-justify the article every few months? Skip1337 (talk) 22:26, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Gazimoff (talk) 10:36, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.