Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel schmitz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as vandalism. (Performed by Gb.) J Milburn (talk) 22:01, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Daniel schmitz

Daniel schmitz (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

This is a hoax. Google has plenty of Daniel Schmitz, but not this one. He "used the vast resources of his organization to support the return of Constantinople to Greece" - yeah, right. "ScamCo LLC" - just the name I would have chosen myself. Not surprisingly, no references from independent sources. JohnCD (talk) 20:29, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete as it appears to be spam. The article links to an external website, run by a Daniel Schmitz. --Kristjan Wager (talk) 21:00, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  • KEEP: It is not a hoax, these are all actual accomplishments by the person responsible for YouAnnoyMe.org, a website that has recieved 10,000+ hits to date. His many books are unverifiable as of now because they are still in the final editing process before publication. ScamCo was so named because it identifies holes in security that could be exploited by scam artists—Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.161.34.112 (talk • contribs) 21:04, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Comment 10,000+ hits? You gotta be kidding me. My blog has received more hits than that, and I certainly won't claim that neither it nor I am worthy of a wiki entry. Unpublished books are certainly not noteworthy. --Kristjan Wager (talk) 21:13, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Comment - his books are dated 2001 and 2002 - final editing is taking a long time! JohnCD (talk) 21:19, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.