Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cockblocking

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 06:28, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Cockblocking

Cockblocking (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Non notable term Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 23:36, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete per nomination non notable term. AlbinoFerret (talk) 00:11, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - not notable. No mention of roosters either. --Starionwolf (talk) 01:26, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep as notable term. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 03:04, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete WP:OR from the didn't-get-laid-blame-someone-else contingent Plutonium27 (talk) 03:39, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Stupid slang made by stupid kids should be deleted, stupid. ^_^ JuJube (talk) 04:31, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Neologism; per WP:NOT#DICT #2 JeremyMcCracken (talk) 04:33, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. It's not that neo a neologism; it's in Cassell's Dictionary of Slang which lists it as first reported in the 1980s. It would be a valid entry in Wiktionary, and indeed is there (Wikt:Cockblock). However, I don't see an encyclopedia entry here, and nothing here is useful to move to Wiktionary, so delete it. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 07:03, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete, undoubtedly an WP:INTERESTING type of behavior, but (at least under this name) there are too few sources for an article beyond a dictionary definition. --Dhartung | Talk 21:30, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per nomination andi064 T . C 15:08, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Fails WP:RS and WP:N. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 15:18, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete for lack of reliable sources, which are especially needed here. Biruitorul (talk) 22:59, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect to Seduction community. Squidfryerchef (talk) 05:07, 31 March 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.