Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coaxial warp drive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Kimchi.sg 06:09, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Coaxial warp drive

Was originally tagged as a speedy, but doesn't fit criteria. Original reason was patent nonsense (which it isn't), but it does look like some rather obscure Trekcruft. Notability? – ClockworkSoul 03:35, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete as copyvio of http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Coaxial_warp_drive. -- nae'blis 03:52, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete copy-vio Leuko 04:05, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as Memory-Alpha content is not GFDL-friendly. Alternatively, delete as Trekcruft. --Kinu ^t/_c 04:09, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as a recent copyvio. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 04:30, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• I'd support a speedy delete, but technically A8 covers commercial content (do Google ad banners count?). It was featured in a _single episode_ of Voyager, however, so it'd still be deleted. ColourBurst 04:38, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

• However, it looks like A8 was designed with WP:SNOW in mind, so I'll tag it anyway. ColourBurst 04:41, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Wryspy 04:52, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete/Speedy Delete Duality between fancruft and copyvio as memory-alpha is creative commons and not GFDL. --Kevin_b_er 05:13, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per nom. Macktheknifeau 05:55, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.