Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chlex

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete'. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 05:07, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Chlex

Chlex (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This is an article about a Smallville fan pairing. There are no sources, it's impossible to write an article about this topic without original research, and it's not notable. There aren't any speedy deletion criteria that really apply and a prod was predictably removed by the article creator P4k 04:06, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. There may be sources for this pairing, but they seem to all be fan fiction and similar material, and thus not reliable sources. --Metropolitan90 04:32, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:N and WP:OR. I don't think we'll find evidence of notability for something this crufty. --Bfigura ^(talk) 05:10, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I ship them, but I wouldn't post an article here about them per nom. Probably much more appropriate for a Smallville wiki. Nate 06:15, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Yes, the term is a fan fiction one - and the ghits are to fan sites, blog sites, You tube, and porn(!) related sites, but, nevertheless, this seems to be a genuine social movement! (P.S. I would not be at all distressed by this article's deletion - my support is because it seems to fall into the 'bizarre, but real notability' class. Anarchia 06:16, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
• Comment Relevant discussion on the article talk page btw.--P4k 06:17, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Importance/significance gets it past WP:CSD#A7. However, to get past Notability, Chlex needs to have received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. The topic fails notability. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 07:31, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Unless reliable sources can be found. Tiddly-Tom 07:36, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Delete Delete Delete No sources. Non-notable. Speculative. Ugh. Delete Joestella 08:04, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete fanfiction, non-notable pretty much by definition, and grossly POV to boot ("Lana takes over most of the action of the series..." etc.) Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:19, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.