Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chess Griffin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. - Consensus is that the topic does not meet the General notability guideline. -- Jreferee t/c 08:23, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Chess Griffin

[edit] Wikipedia chooses to delete articles that people enjoy to read and which are covering notable persons in the FOSS community, rather that consentating on more urgent tasts. Just goes to show that Wiki is not a serious alternative. It's a pitty.

Chess Griffin (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Completing unfinished nom by User:Rtphokie, I abstain. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 20:19, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete We may have a COI here. But anyway, delete because it fails WP:BIO. NASCAR Fan24(radio me!) 20:26, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete article about a lawyer with a podcast without sources fails WP:BIO. Carlossuarez46 04:27, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
  • I think wiki pedia must keep this page. Chess is a most well-known Linux podcast producers. He was interviewed at the Ohio linuxfest by some people (something like the North Ohio open source society?) who also interviewed maddog Hall, Jeremy Garcia and other people. Many people know his podcast and he has helped thousands of new users. He also made some video tutorials for VTC company. maybe his page should be moved to Linux area of wiki pedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.226.181.78 (talk) This comment was added to the talk page of the article, where another copy of the incomplete nomination exists. GRBerry 14:08, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.