Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/But

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete and redirect to grammatical conjunction. Transwiki unnecessary: Wikt:but.--Fuhghettaboutit 22:43, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] But

But (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This is just a dictionary definition. Since this is a conjuction, it can't reasonably be expanded. See WP:NOT#DICT or WP:DICT Obina 19:42, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete and Transwiki as dicdef. Tx17777 19:46, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete or Redirect to Grammatical conjunction. I really don't see the grounds for an article about a conjunction (wow...that was almost a play on words...). As it stands, there is little more in the article than a dictionary definition, and if the article were to be expanded significantly, the only way to do that would be to expand it as a grammatical guide, which is not the function of Wikipedia. Calgary 20:56, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to grammatical conjunction per above. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. --Hdt83 ^Chat 00:39, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
• Transwiki per Tx17777 to the wikitionary, WP is not A dictionnary.--JForget 02:00, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

CommentNo need to trans wiki but is there.Obina 20:47, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

• Redirect per the droll comment by Calgary. Bearian 00:19, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.