Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brett Reed (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge and redirect to Rancid. Action to be taken by others. JERRY ^talk _contribs 01:31, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Brett Reed

Brett Reed (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

The notability of the subject has not been established, and the article lacks any reliable sources by which it can be verified. The current contents of the article appear to violate WP:BLP. - Stephanie Daugherty (Triona) - Talk - Comment - 21:20, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Note A previous AFD resulted in Redirect back in 2005. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Triona (talk • contribs) 21:22, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

• Weak Keep This individual has been a part of a published group in one way or another for close to twenty years. I would strongly suggest, however, that more relevant information be added soon or otherwise face another discussion about deletion, at which point my vote would change to Delete.--InDeBiz1 (talk) 21:51, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
• Merge & redirect to Rancid. Unless there's more to say about him, the content here could be readily incorporated into the band article. If more material becomes available, this page can be re-created. Bondegezou (talk) 15:43, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 15:20, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

• Redirect to Rancid. Could merge, but since the article is unreferenced, that would be unwise unless that is rectified. The article contains nothing that doesn't belong at Rancid and has hardly improved in the 20 months or so since the 2005 AFD. This strongly suggests that the subject has no encyclopedic notability apart from his former band. Quale (talk) 16:55, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete unless verifiable; then merge. --LeyteWolfer (talk) 14:50, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.