Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bradley Berry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete — TKD::Talk 19:30, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bradley Berry

Bradley Berry (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Not notable per WP:BIO. He does not hold an elected position that automatically confers notablility and the sources used do not establish notability through other guidelines. The Oregonian item is an editorial, the picture is only a picture, and the Yamhill County website is not independent of the subject as he works for them. Aboutmovies 19:05, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, notability inferred via weasel wording is highly dubious ("Parallels have been drawn ..."). There are so, so many DAs and every day they do something that pisses somebody off. --Dhartung | Talk 19:59, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
• It appears that the original nomination's rationale is valid, and accordingly, WP:BIO requires deletion. Digwuren 20:29, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Harlowraman 21:25, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - he's gotten some press for the referenced prosecution, but nothing significant that I could find. The "parallel" to Nifong, even if it could be sourced, wouldn't establish notability. Douglasmtaylor ^T/C 23:31, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
• Comment - Several new "sources" have been added to the external links section. This article provides trivial coverage of Berry, and other than mentioning he is the DA gives no information on him. This article is six pages long, but again it is trivial coverage as the topic is the "slap butt day" incident and not Berry (we only learn that Berry is the DA, significant coverage would include extensive info about the subject). Ditto for this article. Aboutmovies 10:45, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
• Comment a DA for a small county is not inherently notable. Bearian 19:32, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.