Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Berries and Creme

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 03:03, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Berries and Creme

Berries and Creme (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

WP is not a place to document every commercial that has aired. In the absence of evidence that this had lasting impact or drew critical commentary (like the 1984 Apple commercial did), there is no reason we should have an article on it. — Carl (CBM · talk) 18:04, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

• I'm a little lad who wants to Delete Berries and Creme. Carl stated it perfect. --Hemlock Martinis 18:08, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per lack of significant coverage from independent sources Corpx 19:03, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I must somewhat disagree that this is just another commercial. It certainly seems to have penetrated the cultural consciousness at least somewhat, though I doubt it'll become an industry milestone like the 1984 ad. But the article has no reliable sources, and a little bit of searching hasn't turned up any either, so this probably should be deleted for now. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 22:13, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
• Well, I am generally in favor of a keep as having the article does not somehow denigrate Wikipedia, but I think a merge or redirect could be fair as well, i.e. say what is important in the main Starburst article (or have an article on Starburst commercials?) and have a redirect to the relevant section, perhaps. Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 01:21, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Which reliable sources are discussing this article in a critical sense? I can't find any. Without attribution to reliable sources, the ad (and what is it - one out of a hundred thousand in the past year?) does not pass WP:ATT. --Charlene 02:00, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
• Comment millions of dollars for a TV ad and this is the best they can come up with? 02:54, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 12:48, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as per above (but not Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles) and WP:NOT. Bearian 20:45, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.