Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aves Chimoio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. While existence has been shown, notability has not. Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:45, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Aves Chimoio

Aves Chimoio (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

That team don't exist.. you can see in [1] and [2]. That team is not listed in any level of Mozambique football leagues —Preceding unsigned comment added by Calapez (talk • contribs) 2008/05/16 15:24:44

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 18:00, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
• It seems like it did exist at some point; it's listed here and here. There's nothing in Google news, but I wouldn't expect to see much there for a team like this. Zagalejo^^^ 18:16, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Well, there's absolutely nothing to be found anywhere for Chimoio Arena, and the refs in Aves Chimoio either don't exist or don't say anything about this team. I dunno... Zagalejo^^^ 18:23, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. Either a hoax or completely unnotable. Either way, delete. Nsk92 (talk) 19:00, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
• This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:35, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Verifiability is an issue for this article which does not cite any reliable sources. Stifle (talk) 22:36, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
• Keep - team existed as recently as 2004. Not a hoax. Neier (talk) 12:21, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

OK, how about notability then? Nsk92 (talk) 13:24, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

• delete Non-notable. -- Alexf⁴² 11:55, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
• Keep per Neier. GiantSnowman 18:42, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Yes, but what about satisfying WP:N? Nsk92 (talk) 20:03, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete even if the mentioned website was a reliable source for the results, it isn't so for an article about the team and the information only shows existence but nothing that would amount to competing beyond regional or second level leagues. Let me also note that that we do not only discuss the original nomination reason here.Tikiwont (talk) 18:38, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.