Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aurora Cudal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Philippe 02:31, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Aurora Cudal

Aurora Cudal (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

I'm sure the Scottish Masonic lodge was right to conclude she was a nice woman, worthy of acclaim, but I wikipedia may wish to take another view. Unreferenced and not notable "lady of distinction" Doc^g 21:56, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Week Delete. As the article is now it reads more like a resume than an actual article. However, some of the achievements and awards given to her may make her notable if third party sources can be found and the article is rewritten in a manner more appropriate for wikipedia. The city of San Diego named a day after her and she received attention from members of congress which might just make her notable enough. Some of her accomplishments in the Philippines are quite impressive as well.Insearchofintelligentlife (talk) 00:08, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete, Wikipedia is not for CVs. Stifle (talk) 14:13, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 17:35, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

• Week Delete. Per intelligent design, but what is a CV?Divinediscourse (talk) 18:28, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

  European term for a resumé. Stifle (talk) 11:35, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.