Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assemblies of God (disambiguation)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 01:13, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Assemblies of God (disambiguation)

Assemblies of God (disambiguation) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

This article is poor and the information is already in the Article for the WAGF. There is no need to keep this page.  Gabriello  talk  21:03, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

  • Keep, valid and appropriate disambiguation page. It would be inappropriate to simply list them on the page for the organization to which they do not belong. --Dhartung | Talk 22:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 22:34, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep The disambiguation page isn't optimally formatted in my mind, but it is completely correct to have one. GRBerry 23:03, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep Not only should it be kept (and perhaps expanded) for the reasons mentioned above--that it would be improper to make one have to go through a page about an unaffiliated organization to find the proper article, but also the mere existence of the disambiguation page makes this clear--there are several different Assemblies of God organizations, each unaffiliated. Brian Waterman, MS, CDP (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 01:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. Multiple unaffiliated organizations with a similar name create a valid need to disambiguate. --Shirahadasha (talk) 02:57, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep - An appropriate and helpful DAB page, I see no policy violation in this case.--Avinesh Jose  T  05:19, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
  • comment maybe we should get disam pages into MfD instead of here. the criteria are really straightforward. DGG (talk) 16:28, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. Huh? Surely a no-brainer. Dab page for valid and undisputed articles. Some weird stuff showing up in Vfd these days. c.f. [1]. Must be the weather. Jellogirl (talk) 17:46, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.