Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angus Tók Hnífinn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Shirahadasha (talk) 04:40, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Angus Tók Hnífinn

Angus Tók Hnífinn (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable album by non-notable band who have already been deleted - ie fails WP:N and in particular Wikipedia:Notability (music). Springnuts (talk) 23:05, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because this is a demo album released by the same band, with no claim of meeting WP:MUSIC in article:

Hér Skal Vera Fjör! (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
  • Delete I have difficulty believing in the notability of an album by a band whose article was deleted due to an expired prod. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 23:16, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
    • Ditto on the second album up for deletion. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 06:23, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Album is not yet released, and no claim of meeting WP:Notability or WP:MUSIC in article.--Fabrictramp (talk) 00:36, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. I tried adding a speedy template, before I noticed it already had been declined. However, I think this should have been speedied. ( I notice there is a lot of discussing about that on the speedy-talkpage. Given an album is less than a band, it should be more obvious it could be speedied than a band, and a band who is unable to defend an article will never be able to defend an article about one of it's albums. Leave the creator with the job of asking for undeletion of the various album-articles if they ever manage to show notability for the band itself then.) Greswik (talk) 10:42, 4 January 2008 (UTC) Addendum: see undeletion request at [1], commons about the album cover: uploader claims to be a part of the band. The band article was made by someone with the same username here. Ie: this is also spam, and COI. Greswik (talk) 10:59, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Snowball delete both. If the band's not notable, then the album articles don't have a snowball's chance in hell. On top of that, this album hasn't even been released yet, and the other is a demo tape.-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 02:59, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.