Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Hunt

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:41, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Amy Hunt

Amy Hunt (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

I don't see how the subject of this article meets the notability requirements for an author (as the subject is only a minor contributor to the book that is being used to assert notability), but there was opposition to a speedy deletion, so I'm wondering what other people think about this. Thanks Rnb (talk) 01:00, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete no evidence of notability. JJL (talk) 03:36, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Strong delete. No assertion or evidence of notability. Fails WP:BIO and WP:BK. I'm sorry, but one story in an anthology is not sufficient to establish a writer as a notable author. Qworty (talk) 04:15, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete One published essay, even if well received, doesn't establish notability. If anything, it falls under WP:BLP1E. Probably a vanity/autobio case as well, but the creator isn't an SPA, so not a concern. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 05:24, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete. Completely non-notable, very likely to have been written by the subject. Voyaging(talk) 16:38, 13 April 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.