Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexa Woods

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 01:35, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Alexa Woods

Alexa Woods (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

This article is about a fictional character that appears only in one film and is not notable enough to warrant a stand-alone article. The article lacks any reliable secondary sources (it references only the film itself), and it is unlikely that any suitable secondary sources could be found to support an independent article about this character or indicate the character's notability. The article consists mainly of a direct copy of the "Plot" section from Alien vs. Predator (film), and all the significant information about the character is already covered in that article and in List of characters in the Alien vs. Predator series. --IllaZilla (talk) 03:17, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per my reasons above. --IllaZilla (talk) 03:33, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete WP:N and WP:RS issues are always related. The lack of reliable sourcing indicates that this fictional character needs not have a dedicated article. Redirect as appropriate. Blaxthos ( t / c ) 03:28, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment: I felt a redirect, though a simpler solution, was unnecessary because nearly all the articles that link to this one do so only through a template (Template:Alien), therefore it would be easy to eliminate these links if the article was deleted. Basically the article was split off from Alien vs. Predator (film) when it never should have been, so I thought deletion rather than redirection was the better option. --IllaZilla (talk) 03:37, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - Per nom. asenine ^{say what?} 06:03, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete and redirect per Blaxthos. JuJube (talk) 06:42, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 16:22, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:N. No redirect. -- Magioladitis (talk) 18:11, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom's spot on analysis. I have nothing to add to their rationale. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 08:14, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Well put. Eusebeus (talk) 14:21, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. — Wenli ^{(reply here)} 02:24, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.