Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advancing hairline
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Coredesat 07:14, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Advancing hairline
This page appears to have been created as a way to disparage Sean Hannity and Andrew Napolitano.[1] I deleted the BLP material, and the page now largely duplicates receding hairline information in Baldness. Delete and redirect to Baldness seems the way to go on this one. -- Jreferee (Talk) 18:58, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect to baldness per nom. Article serves no purpose, with or without the disparaging BLP info. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 19:05, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Redirect, WP:SNOW. Weregerbil 20:04, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Comment I kinda like the Fox shout-outs. Will their hairlines and eyebrows merge eventually? :) You do need examples, after all. MarkBul 20:18, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete with no redirect. I see no evidence on google that anyone uses this as a term for baldness, and actually quite the opposite. Someguy1221 21:56, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. The idiomatic phrase is "receding hairline". Advancing is the other direction. —David Eppstein 04:04, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete without redirect. Orphan anyway. Thin Arthur 08:59, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Redirect per nom. Some student might use the term. Bearian 01:14, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete without redirect. Dicdef of a slang term. Urban dictionary is that way. BTW, this isn't slang for balding, it's slang for getting a hair transplant, so if a redirect is left, shouldn't it go to Hair transplantation instead of Baldness? --barneca (talk) 14:07, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

