Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abul Lais Siddiqui

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Veinor (talk to me) 17:02, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Abul Lais Siddiqui

Abul Lais Siddiqui (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

no sources, notablility not established. Delete. Jefferson Anderson 18:49, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete. The articles on Yunus Hasni, Abul Lais Siddiqui, Sahar Ansari, and Moinuddin Aqeel are all equally short, unsourced, and so textually similar that it looks like they have been copied and pasted to each other. This scholar needs to be distinguished somehow from the other three in order to convince me that he is notable. —David Eppstein 20:31, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
  • DO NOT DELETE. One should amend the articles or prescribe changes rather voting for the deletion. The text looks similar as the scholars are of a same field and the works they have done are almost similar. The scholars are noted in their fields and their entries should remain intact. Books added. Abul Lais Siddiqui has much different content than the others. 14:25, 14 April 2007 User:221.132.113.214
  • Delete per nom. Arbustoo 07:21, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I don't see that these books alone establish notability without some demonstration of their impact. The subject would not qualify as a notable author, and I don't see that WP:PROF is met either. Article is unsourced. Pete.Hurd 20:03, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.